Published FreeAI answer
Do not ask the AI to polish the notes immediately. First ask it to separate facts, decisions, ideas, questions, risks, and actions. Messy notes often mix all six, and attractive prose can hide the difference.
Provide the purpose of the plan and its time horizon. Explain who owns the outcome, the deadline, available people or budget, and any non-negotiable constraints. Tell the model not to invent missing owners, dates, or resources. Unknowns should remain visible.
Next, ask for a short objective and acceptance criteria. The objective describes the outcome. Acceptance criteria describe what observable evidence proves it is complete. This keeps the plan focused on results instead of producing a long activity list.
Convert each real action into a line with an owner, deliverable, dependency, and deadline. Sequence actions according to dependencies rather than the order in which they appeared in the notes. Separate decisions that block execution from tasks that can begin immediately.
Add a risk check. Identify the few assumptions most likely to change the plan, what evidence would invalidate them, and when they should be tested. Avoid generic risks such as “communication may be difficult.” A useful risk has a cause, impact, and mitigation.
Finish with a concise version that can be used day to day: objective, current status, next three actions, blockers, and stop condition. Keep the detailed evidence underneath or in a linked appendix. When circumstances change, update the facts and decisions first, then regenerate only the affected part of the plan. This is more reliable than repeatedly rewriting the entire document.
Related questions
- What makes an acceptance criterion observable?
- How should I assign owners and deadlines in a plan?
- How do I identify the assumptions that could break a plan?